Now is the time to fix your worst incentive plans, or adjust pay structures that have crumbled under the weight of furloughs, lay-offs, remote work, shrinkage, growth, or any other of the myriad of issues that are being faced in business. Yes, you are tired. But so are your competitors. The best time to win is when they can’t respond. In a world where increases have been in low single digits for a decade, it doesn’t take too much to set your company above the crowd.

Let’s start by discussing a couple of the new things where you will need to help. Publicly-traded companies need to produce a Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) and a Summary Compensation Table as part of their public filings. The CD&A is a narrative document that tells the story of your executive compensation program. The Summary Compensation Table details the prior three years of compensation for your Named Executive Officers (the Top 5 paid officers including your CEO and CFO.

The De-SPAC process usually runs from 3-5 months. During this time both parties work to convince current and potential shareholders that the union will work. Regulatory bodies like the SEC also get involved and provide their opinions on the impending marriage. The companies involved may also look to…

If you’ve been with your company a while this may mean a small pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Of course, SPACs are unusual, so yours will seldom end as quickly as finding the mythical leprechaun’s fortune. Let’s cover the last few unique hurdles and get on to the good stuff.

In a sense, the SEC is asking if the Emperor is wearing any clothes. Many SPAC transactions have been completed successfully. Some have seriously less successful. This is to be expected and is not dissimilar from the traditional IPO market. Some succeed, some fail. But the SEC has seen…

Usually the drive for pay for performance comes from the top of the company. “We need to have people be more productive.” “I don't want to have to pay people that much, unless they are REALLY doing a great job.” While these are valid concerns, we must be able to better define what people do that makes a company successful.

Round and round it goes, where it stops, everyone knows. Lately, I have been wondering what it will really take to change things in the world of compensation. It would seem that we have more than enough motivation to result in real changes to compensation practices that have been ineffective, or worse, seemingly forever. There seem to be enough incentives to create more successful companies and pay people in a way that allows them to have better lives. A large number of Human Resources and Compensation professionals seem engaged enough to give them the push to make materials improvements. But the hamster wheel keeps squeaking.

Anyone who has taken a class or performed a Google-search on performance goals has learned about the concept of “SMART” goals. The most common breakdown seems to be: S - Specific, M - Measurable, A - Attainable, R - Relevant, and T - Time-bound. We all seem to know this and yet many still seem to have problems creating successful pay for performance programs. I would like to propose a new D.U.M.B. approach that celebrates the spirit of insanity.

Editor's Note: Ever feel like things are a little backward pay program wise? You're not alone, friend! Dan Walter, master of the compensation metaphor, shines a light on the Classic problem we all face at one time or another - particularly those of us who work in or serve smaller, entrepreneurial organizations.